Data center ordinance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 3
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 10, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Kessler pushed for bonding on decommissioning, said the 100,000 sq ft building cap is too small, urged cutting impervious coverage to 60% and building height to 40 feet near residential areas.
Board of Supervisors Agendas - Nov 10, 2026 · 1:33:13 →Kessler called the 300-foot setback 'ridiculous,' demanded at least 1,000 feet, and questioned how a 200-foot loading zone fits within the setback.
Board of Supervisors Agendas - Nov 10, 2026 · 1:36:10 →Wright backed the 1,000-foot setback and proposed requiring data center applications five to ten years before groundbreaking; the solicitor explained MPC deadlines make that unworkable.
Board of Supervisors Agendas - Nov 10, 2026 · 13:45 →Lober praised the work and asked the township to add an e-waste management plan so failed servers don't end up in landfills.
Board of Supervisors Agendas - Nov 10, 2026 · 1:41:21 →Lyons thanked the board for being proactive, asked where the overlay district sits (the one neighborhood design district off Wenrick Street), and suggested adding tonal noise limits, backup generator restrictions, a peak-shaving ban, and setbacks for generators and cooling equipment.
Board of Supervisors Agendas - Nov 10, 2026 · 1:42:33 →